Clarification on Submission Rules

Thanks for asking, and also making us aware that the second site is the same company. That has been noted for future reference. It may or may not be ok to have both sites, I did not spend time reviewing them, (since I do not edit in that area), but it's always better that editors are aware of possible conflicts.

You're confusing the absence of content (our measure of non-quality) with the presence of something else. Google is a quality website, even though 95+% of many search results are pure junk. It's the presence of the useful search results that matter.

The advantage of human reviewers is that they CAN ignore the idiot attempts at SERP perping, and the occasional bad links, and the unattractive page layout, and the witless Font-Plague-ish HTML generation, and many other vices THESE sites don't even have, and focus on the information.

If THAT'S not there, then we have a problem.