It is absolutely certain that the editors who explained how the site re-review SHOULD work, do NOT have interests in your competitors. So their description of the process was based on ODP ideals, best practice, and common activities.
You may, of course, assume whatever ulterior motives you wish. Recently I ran into a man who really believes the World Trade Center atrocity was engineered by "Skull and Bones" (a tiny college club) in order to invade Afghanistan. He didn't explain why anyone, least of all a tiny group of college alumni, would WANT to invade Afghanistan -- except for the the oil and the sunny beaches and zenophobic tribesmen and arctic winters, there's nothing there ... and there is no oil and no sunny beaches.
So I've sworn off trying to talk people out of what I regard as irrational paranoia.