Motsa your answers our the best I have yet to see throughout these blogs. My simple point has been that you don't know what a site has to offer if it has never been reviewed. 4 years in my opinion is WAY too long. Yes this person broke guidelines by resubmitting, but I can definitely understand why. As I have pondered doing the same myself. My suggestions aren't rants. One of your directors has clearly asked for suggestions on your website so this is what I have done. If a verification was done many of these "rants" would have no backing in my opinion. Or if we were simply told that our sites were rejected I would be satisfied with that as well. But keeping people in limbo is unacceptable. Throughout the forums editors continue to tell people that "it's more likely that your site just has not been reviewed." This is where my frustration and disappointment comes from. I say again, if you have not reviewed the site you have no idea of what it has to offer.